I am lagging in completing several blog posts.
While sorting my thoughts, illustrations, and wording of how-tos for those, I am enjoying the immediacy, clarity, and sometimes surprises of single-bed fair-isle knitting of some of the repeats shared in my published but not knit-tested collections.
This post is another “work in progress”, growing over time.
A reminder: the PNGs here are published as indexed BW, but when copied, will often convert and save in RGB Mode. Test and convert them back to BW before using them for download to machines. Not doing so can result in some interesting glitches with the appearance of errors in preselection.
Beginning with a 12X12 design, where symmetry is not the goal,
rotating/repeating the file for a 24X24 repeat 
![]()
knit as DBJ on an electronic model due to the anticipated long floats.
34X30 ![]()
knit double width and height
16X38![]()

18X16![]()

a previously shared cousin, 30X30. 
![]()

I have long been intrigued by the complexity of the hand-knit fox paw patterns. Published HK directions may be found in Xandy Peters’ blog.
These two shares are the very simplified versions of the inspiration sources.
The concepts were tested as fair isle; there are problematic long floats, reduced in number in the second variation.
A color-inverted image of the original PNG drawn in repeat could be used to fill areas with multiple colors, with the intent of possibly producing the results in DBJ after the supplemental software has performed the necessary color separation.
24X80
![]()


visualizing multiple color DBJ options using a coloring book approach
24X82, far fewer problem floats ![]()


28X28, some floats wider than the usual recommended max of 5 stitch width, knit in all rayon, space dyed yarn pools unpredictably![]()

30X30
![]()

24X34, untested ![]()
38X20![]()

38X62
![]()

48X48
![]()

48X48![]()

54X54
tested on 82 stitches with programmed PNG 82X54, 
the digitally color-inverted knit image compared with the original.
After the share, I noticed there appeared to be a pattern error in the center tile. Comparing the knit to the programmed repeat, the PNG appears correct.
A different day, different yarns, the same programmed repeat, an error-free sample.
Perhaps misselection in the initial swatch can be attributed to yarn tension/ feeding issues, static, or simply an unknown patterning crankiness.
Black and white pixels to black and white knit stitches:
larger patchwork, 64X64

Blocks and lines can create movement and at times optical illusions. Strong verticals may separate slightly at edges, and slippery yarns ie, chenilles and rayons, may worm and distort stitch shapes. DBJ is generally more stable, but with a different appearance.
Several added designs with repeating blocks in various sizes may be found in the posts:
A collection of geometric design blocks built with squares, rectangles, and lines
Developing tiled repeats suitable for multiple stitch types, including tuck
32X32![]()

52X48![]()

a 28X30 single repeat![]()
60X30 testing the addition of pixels to form alternating wider bands of vertical patterning![]()

62X62
186X186
test knit single repeat
the tiled image can be cropped to change the focus of the design
46X46
184X184
92X92 test knit
64X64
192X192
a full single knit repeat
Back to using color, 38X34![]()


An 8X8 design that, when drawn in repeat, may be used on any machine: for electronic models, a 32X32 PNG,
and or punchcard models, the full 24X40 chart.

Previous blog posts containing FI info
Working with diagonal patterning in machine knitting
Shadow pleats with fair isle patterning
Revisiting fair isle, thread lace, 3D surface potential
Fair Isle single bed 1: float control
Fair isle variations and swatches
Matching patterns across sweater bodies and sleeves
Adding hand techniques/ cables/ punchcard repeats
Lace meets FI on Brother machines
Scarf experiments
Altered patterning using bleach discharge on knits